Bruno vs Postman
Bruno says it does the job of Postman for less. Here's the price, what you get, and what you give up.
The short answer
You save 68% per user
Pick Bruno if you want
API requests and tests stored as files in your Git repo; works offline.
Stay with Postman if this is a deal-breaker
No cloud workspace or built-in mock servers like Postman.
| Bruno | Postman | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $6 | $19 |
| Saving | 68% less | — |
| Best for | API requests and tests stored as files in your Git repo; works offline. | Teams that want the biggest, most complete option |
| Trade-off | No cloud workspace or built-in mock servers like Postman. | You pay more |
| Switching effort | Easy | — |
| Last checked | 2026-11-11 |
Questions people ask
Is Bruno cheaper than Postman?
By Bruno's own pricing claim, yes: $6 vs $19, about 68% less. Check both pricing pages before you buy.
What do you give up switching from Postman to Bruno?
No cloud workspace or built-in mock servers like Postman.
What do you get with Bruno?
API requests and tests stored as files in your Git repo; works offline.
How do I switch from Postman to Bruno?
Export your data first, test a small import, run both side by side for a week, then cancel before your renewal date.